Peer Review Process

RESEARCH INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed, academic, multidisciplinary journal that examines submitted manuscripts through an independent review process. The quality, originality, relevance and academic integrity of articles in the journal are maintained by peer review.

The journal uses a structured review system that enables the editorial process to be fair, objective and evidence-based.

Initial Editorial Assessment

Each manuscript is sent for initial editorial screening upon submission to see if the manuscript is within the scope of the journal and meets the requirements for manuscript submission. It is also possible for manuscripts to be evaluated for their originality, ethical standards, academic quality, and conformance with publication standards.

Manuscripts not suitable for the journal will not undergo the review process prior to publication.

Peer Review Procedure

A typical review process consists of the following steps:

• Manuscript Submission – The authors submit their manuscript via the journal's submission system or via the submission channel provided.
• Editorial Screening – The editorial team checks whether the manuscript is suitable for the journal and adheres to the journal's policies.
• Peer Review – Eligible manuscripts are submitted to reviewers who are qualified and have subject knowledge.
• Reviewer Recommendations – These are comments, suggestions and recommendations made by the reviewers.
• Editorial Decision – The editor takes into account the reviewers' comments and informs the author of the editorial decision.
• Revision (If necessary) – Authors may be asked to revise their article in light of reviewers' comments.
• Final Decision – Editor's final decision after considering the revised paper and reviewers' recommendations.

Review Criteria

Manuscripts are evaluated for publication by reviewers on the following criteria:

• Originality and significance of the research
• Relevance to the journal's scope
• Soundness of methodology and analysis
• Clarity and organization of presentation
• Accuracy of references and citations
• Contribution to existing knowledge

Confidentiality and Ethical Standards

The manuscripts received by the journal are confidential. Editors and reviewers should strive for confidentiality and report any conflict of interest which may influence the editorial or reviewing process.

The journal is consistent with the principles of publication ethics and promptly and appropriately addresses any concerns relating to the integrity of research and publication.

Editorial Decisions

A manuscript may be considered for either of the following actions:

• Accepted for publication
• Accepted subject to revisions
• Returned for major revisions and resubmission
• Rejected

Final publication decision is up to the editor's judgment.

For Prospective Authors

Authors are invited to submit their manuscript if it is original, methodological and relevant to the interdisciplinary focus of the journal. Before submitting to the journal, make sure to read the author guidelines and journal policies to aid in the review process.